What is a California Split? So glad you asked.

A California Split is used the judge a class is very large (usually over 25 horses) or in a combined division like the junior hunters.

A judge typically keeps a “stagger” or a ranking of the top eight ribbon winners as a class goes on.

In a California Split, the judge needs to rank 16 ribbon winners. At the end of the class (typically after seeing 50-plus rounds), the judge pins the class as follows:

#1 & #2 on stagger each win Division A and Division B of the same class
#3 & #4 on stagger are second in Division A and Division B of the same class
#5 & #6 on stagger are third in Division A and Divisions B of the same class.
And so on..

How else can a big class be split?

Another way to split a class of 50 low hunters is when the 25th horse goes in the first class of two back-to-back rounds, the judge pins both the classes. (The second class will usually only have 15-20 that have gone since some riders choose to only do one class.) This is often called a Casual Split.

Where did the name come from?

Apparently not from California! The California Split is an East Coast innovation. After asking many people who have been around the industry as judges and horse show managers for years, it’s unclear where the name comes from.

There is some sense that it originated at the Winter Equestrian Festival (WEF) in Florida with large classes in the juniors. According to one judge, the term California Split was originally used when a junior hunter class was judged by one judge as the first class of the division and by a second judge as the Maclay.

How do judges feel about it?

Some judges don’t like the California Split because it means keeping track of 16 ribbon winners, which can be unwieldy and exhausting.

Usually, after you have your top eight ribbon winners ranked in a large class, you only need to work in the rounds that are good enough to fall into that top group. With a California Split, you have to work in any round that would place in the top 16 in the class.

However, other judges prefer the California Split to a Casual Split because it can mean that the best rounds get rewarded. In a Casual Split, the strength of each division is more or less random. Division A might have better rounds than Division B for whatever reason. In that case, a horse that wins Division B might not be nearly as good as the horse that wins Division A. With a California Split, the best horses and rounds in the class are rewarded accordingly.


Kim Ablon Whitney is an ‘R’ judge and the author of the Show Circuit Series.  She also runs the blog Below the Cutoff: A Look at the Horse Show Life.